New World Orders

Is global governance a unifying bridge for humanity or the ultimate form of oligarchy?

Preamble:

Every week, maybe every day, there is a point of news that has the capacity to pierce one with concern, fear, anger, despair, or any other negative emotion, (that’s probably a major reason why I am the antithesis to a news junky).

Calling these negative emotions is not to say they are bad and should be avoided. We feel what we feel.

To be angry at injustice and oppression is probably a sign that you have a heart, conscience, and soul. I mean negative emotions in the sense that they detract from the light in our life. This is darkness.

Still, as you’ve probably heard many times, there is no light without darkness. The light shines and casts a shadow. There is a necessary tension in living. Struggling to remove this tension is unlikely to yield anything but greater tension.

The G20 Declaration

Now that I have that out of the way, let’s get to the darkness that hit me this week. As much as I avoid the mainstream news channels, it is hard to completely insulate from certain things unless you live remotely and embrace a certain reclusiveness. This is quite tempting to me but with two teenage daughters it is a hard sell.

So.. the darkness.. the G20 Bali Leaders’ declaration. Before I dip any further into this pit, I want to communicate that I will continue to strive to offer light with darkness, actions, possibilities, maybe even solutions. But those are on the other side if the caverns.

I cannot just sing Kumbaya on it all right now. Ironically enough, kum ba ya is actually originally an appeal for God to come and help those in need. If that’s its intention, maybe we should be singing it. I think most people take Kumbaya as a more of a Hakuna Matata song, which literally translates to “no worries”. Rot needs to be exposed to light, churned and mulched, and then we can use it as a fine compost to grow a nourishing garden from.

So, the G20.

Read this statement:

“Fourteen years ago, the Leaders of the G20 met for the first time, facing the most severe financial crisis in our generation. We recognized, as large global economies, that collectively we carry responsibilities and that our cooperation was necessary to global economic recovery, to tackle global challenges, and lay a foundation for strong, sustainable, balanced, and inclusive growth. We designated the G20 the premier forum for global economic cooperation, and today we reaffirm our commitment to cooperate as we, once again, address serious global economic challenges.”¹

I don’t know you feel after a scan but my gut doesn’t have a good feeling. As you continue to read this document, it is filled with language that could be construed as having cooperative intentions to make the world a better place. If I was less jaded by my understanding of these players’ histories, maybe I’d be more trusting and hopeful.

Alas, that seems like naivety to me.

Who are the G20?

The members of the G20 are: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Türkiye, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union. Each year, the presidency invites guest countries to participate. Spain is invited as a permanent guest.

That’s actually 21, so we already know they are misrepresenting themselves.

Also, there’s a few odd balls in there if you are looking at countries from a political science perspective.

Ahhh… that’s the catch though. It is all about economics. That’s why Saudi Arabia, Russia and China can hang out with the UK, the US, and Canada.

Unfortunately, or perhaps revealingly, the last almost three years have exposed the so-called democratic, free society countries as being quite capable of taking on the characteristics of those with reputations for caring less about human rights and civil liberties. For the non-MSM news aficionados, critical analysts of history, and the never more popular conspiracy theorists (don’t fret, it’s a term of endearment coming from me), this has been an illusion for a long time. Maybe it’s always been one.

US, British, and Canadian history are all littered with human rights abuses and government overreach, (i.e, slavery, internment camps, civilian surveillance, sterilization campaigns, deranged scientific experiments, domestic propaganda, etc.). That being said, I will readily admit I’d rather live in Canada then China. But that’s why I am concerned when Canada feels like it continues to slide in the direction of the CCP’s China.

For example:

The fact that all these countries leadership can get along and collectively attempt to shape the world obviously means they have some common agendas. This might make some optimistic but I see it as a reflection of the next stage of neoliberalism - a global oligarchical corporatocracy on steroids. This globalist anabolic gear stack is a blend of biotech and digital infrastructure driving a commoditization of human life through these mechanisms and others.

In 2009, this crew “declared itself the primary venue for international economic and financial cooperation”². This is what they do. They declare themselves.

Let me try it. I declare myself above the law, free of taxation, and ageless. Well, it seems to be working so far but it’s only been a few seconds, tax season isn’t upon us yet, and I am not committing any crimes currently to test my legal immunity out.

Come to think of it, I believe this is exactly what Ray Kurzweil, Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab, Jeff Bezos, and various other transhumanism advocates are declaring regularly. They seem to be having some success with it as well, at least the above the law and free of taxation part. I don’t believe they will achieve any sort of immortality with a greater cybernetic meld in their quasi-religious ascension event they label the Singularity.

The idea that you can give up your physical body and have your consciousness reside forever in a machine is to me a departure from the very thing that makes you essentially human. I believe this desire comes from a fear of death and a misanthropy that constantly rejects the miraculous nature of organic life. These types believe that technology can solve everything, that we are just biological machines and deeply flawed. They scoff at evolution and go to war with nature. I believe this is what sits under the pretty words from the G20.

It is “interesting” that this club first met in 2008. Of course, they state it was in response to the global economic meltdown that occurred, but did they really fix anything?

Is this the other side of a timeline to their plans that were hatched (or maybe even revisited) in 2008?

Now let’s get to the meat… or maybe the lab grown meat or ze bugz or the impossible burger…

In this same declaration it states [emphasis mine]:

“23. We recognize the need for strengthening local and regional health product manufacturing capacities and cooperation as well as sustainable global and regional research and development networks to facilitate better access to VTDs globally, especially in developing countries, and underscore the importance of public-private partnership, and technology transfer and knowledge sharing on voluntary and mutually agreed terms. We support the WHO mRNA Vaccine Technology Transfer hub as well as all as the spokes in all regions of the world with the objective of sharing technology and technical know-how on voluntary and mutually agreed terms. We welcome joint research and joint production of vaccines, including enhanced cooperation among developing countries. We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations. We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.”³

Okay, I don’t know about you but through the legalese and political fluff I read:

We plan to unify biomedical surveillance globally through digital “show me your papers” under the decisions of the WHO. We think the last 2.5 years of mandates and suppression of human rights - including freedom to move, assemble, access services, etc. - has been a success.

That would be laughable, if it wasn’t so tragic. For example:

• A (overly) gentle assessment on lockdowns as a failure

• Early 2021 assessment on lockdown’s ineffectiveness

Whadafuq?!

In the face of ever growing public knowledge about the inefficacious jabs, (e.g., don’t prevent transmission, don’t have long lasting immunity, don’t really do anything of value for current dominant variants, etc.) - never mind the original misinformation and fraud (see the article, Being Pfollowed and Pfressured, for more on this - how could they leverage this botched experiment as an inspiration for a centralized mRNA vaccine hub?

I won’t even get into the safety side of this technology here and now. It shouldn’t be needed to justify the irrationality of their claim.

[Watch the capture of the precipitous waning of the “vaccines’ efficacy in headlines.]

If a car cannot drive, does it matter what its safety tests determine?

To stick with this analogy, they didn’t even do safety tests outside the parking lot but they did put a large spike in front of each passenger seat at the level of the heart.

I’ll stick to walking, thanks.

Then they declare that vaccine certificates have been a success. Again… whadafuq?!

How could they make a claim of success?

A la Tony Montana in Scarface, these people are high on their own supply. They are drunk with hubris, power, and their technological transhumanist vision of the future.

This is their goal:

You might be saying what does the WEF and Klaus Schwab have to do with the G20?

Good question!

There were claims that he attended, which is odd for a non-politician to be at a summit comprised of political leaders. He probably shouldn’t be there. Neither should Gates. But he has been in the past.

Supposedly, Gates was not there this year as he was in Kenya working on an associated project. In my mind, this is worthy of similar scrutiny. Schwab was at the B20 which was taking place in Bali as well and part of the G20⁴. This does seem to be close enough to posit his influence on the proceedings.

While the fact-checkers (or fuct-checkers to more accurately describe their bought off, colluding, and bias ways) constantly attempt to downplay Gates, Schwab, and the Davos crowds influence in the trajectory of supposedly democratic Western countries, they rarely can do so without straw man arguments and/or other fallacious logic.

Regardless, the bottom line - which I don’t think can be ignored and the core of this article - is why are agents not elected (and rarely with adequate credentials/qualifications) so readily promoted in opinion and embraced in policy?

How do Western nations justify kowtowing to these entities and still maintain the claim they are democratic and independent?

Why do the citizens of these nations accept this?

Why the G20 Declaration is Antithetical to Human and Planetary Well-Being

It is my opinion that the G20’s declaration and their stated goals is in no way commensurate with:

• the reality of increasing human well-being, prosperity, and freedom

• the adoption and proliferation of democracy internationally

• individuals and localized communities taking responsibility and action for environmental improvements

• actual biodiversity enhancement and protection in regards to flora, fauna, human culture, or any other pluralistic and multifaceted manifestation that is related to a complex and resilient ecosystem

In other words, it is lip service.

This shouldn’t be a surprise since this group is comprised of politicians. It is also another event, like Davos and COP27, where these sanctimonious types fly virtually empty private jets en masse to an exotic location to discuss “how to improve the direction of the world” while they wear lavish outfits, eat seven course meals, and pretty much act like they are at a Hollywood gala.

This analogy is fitting because they are acting and it is a show.

Let’s talk democracy first:

Democracy is ill represented when secretive meetings occur between our political leaders, industry, and global agencies.

The word democracy comes from the Greek words "demos", meaning people, and "kratos" meaning power; so democracy can be thought of as "power of the people": a way of governing which depends on the will of the people.

Considering there are many versions of democracy in the world, it is sometimes easier to describe it as what it is not. It is NOT:

• autocracy or dictatorship, where one person rules

• oligarchy, where a small segment of society rules

And it should not even be "rule of the majority", if that means that minorities' interests are ignored completely. A democracy, at least in theory, is government on behalf of all the people, according to their "will".

The idea of democracy derives its moral strength – and popular appeal – from two key principles:

1. Individual autonomy: The idea that no-one should be subject to rules which have been imposed by others. People should be able to control their own lives (within reason).

2. Equality: The idea that everyone should have the same opportunity to influence the decisions that affect people in society.

If you follow all of this, it is clear that these meetings are not aligned with the notion of democracy.

The importance of agency and responsibility:

All over the declaration and implied in both the coordination of these events and the creation of global agencies is the notion of cooperation. Cooperation is a great concept. It is a vital aspect of a working democracy. However, cooperation is only true cooperation when it comes voluntarily. There must be agency, choice, and responsibility for it to be cooperation.

Populations coerced, or mandated into doing the bidding of global leaders is not cooperation, it is not democracy, but it IS an oligarchy utilizing authoritarian diktats.

When corporate leaders are embedded within this oligarchy, it is a corporatocracy. It is the endpoint of neoliberalism and was warned against by the 34th President of the United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower:

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.⁵

[Note: this whole speech is well worth the read.]

It was warned about by many others as well. Aldous Huxley noted it as already fully operational almost a century ago:

“This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country’s working force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many millions more by lending them the money to buy its products, and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody. To parody the words of W. Churchill, never have so many been manipulated so much by few.”⁶

It is highly ironic that events like the G20 and the words that fall from the lips of leaders like Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, publicly celebrate the value of individual human agency while their actions and plans are diametrically opposed to it.

If the G20 and our leaders want to be respected and taken seriously, their actions must match their stated goals. Unilateral (or oligarchical) decisions of how we must live are not reflective of this.

We have just lived through three years of topdown mandates that were not based on logic, science, law, or ethics. The bitter icing on this cake is that oligarchical censorship and massive suppression of alternative solutions and even respectful dialogue with highly qualified world renowned experts was rampant.

We would be beyond foolish to trust these forces with anything else until comprehensive reform takes place. They have proven themselves drunk with power.

Real Biodiversity in All Its Manifestations:

The G20 mention the protection of biodiversity while simultaneously are invested in a monoculture of global governance and operations. A centralized global government with stakeholder corporations contracted to create, implement, and maintain infrastructure is akin to replacing a biodynamic, regenerative farm with an industrialized monoculture operation.

This seems to be the vision of our leaders, their globalist cronies, and the most dominant corporations in the world. The monopolistic practices that allowed these multinational companies to transcend borders, laws, taxes, and the free market are not suddenly going to transform into open-source reciprocity.

A forest is both richer and more resilient with a diversity of flora and fauna. It withstands disease and has far greater regenerative capacity than a commercial monoculture tree farm or forest. To me, this same principle applies to all of life. Diversity and decentralized organization create greater health, beauty, durability, adaptation, and richness.

In my opinion, whether it is in relation to democracy, agency, or biodiversity, the current iteration of globalist vision and, even more so their actions, are not the path to the improvements we need in this world, globally or locally. Knowing these players, their histories, and allegiances, I have to ask:

Why would we let the fox guard the henhouse?

So what shall we do?

Perhaps it is is as simple as mass noncompliance. It is our time to challenge these power structures that have existed, in one shape or another, for thousands of years. We have made gains but we have also become complacent and taken for granted the freedoms that we have won.

In the broad spectrum of history, human rights and individual liberties have enjoyed a tiny fraction of significant foothold. The forces of authoritarianism have been the rule and not the exception. We must not let our guard down.

The vast majority of people can relate on most things. We want food, shelter, connection, health, joy, celebration, safety for our family, learning and maybe a little adventure. It is through this resonance that we have power; this and our sheer numbers. The very tiny percentage of those who would choose to lord over us because power and control are more important to them than what I just mentioned are no match for people united.

Perhaps it is idealistic, but as the forces of global domination drive for more power and control, I see it as their last stand. They are grasping for control which is fleeting and illusory anyways. They are scared of the people, of mortality, of being just a part of nature instead of holding dominion over it. This is their death rattle.

This is our birth canal. The pressure is tight and undulating but their is a beautiful light and world ahead. Midwives are needed to help with this transition. We are all capable of being those midwives.

I think we should foster community, sow the seeds of decentralized organization, and not be intimidated with the intimations of these scared, would-be (petty) tyrants.

1. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/11/16/g20-bali-leaders-declaration/

2. http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/09/24/us.g.twenty.summit/index.html

3. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/11/16/g20-bali-leaders-declaration/

4. https://www.b20businesssummit.com/b20/

5. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/eisenhower001.asp

6. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/648908-this-power-elite-directly-employs-several-millions-of-the-country-s