The War Between Them There and Us Here
Inflamed Division Creates Susceptibility to More Mandates and Authoritarianism Ahead
In the last three years plus, how many days have I pondered the dark absurdity that prevails time and time again in a country that once seemed free and reasonable? The answer is way too many. Living in Canada used to feel like a blessing, an almost guaranteed sanctuary from the possibility of totalitarianism in any form. Unfortunately, only the functionally impaired, the hopelessly indoctrinated, and the complicit would deny that things have slid far from our former state of pride and ease. I would say that that is the lesson here, or at least one of them. We can never be complacent, no matter how secure with think our freedom and rights are. History shows this well.
Beyond the never-ending conveyor belt of scandals that Trudeau’s Liberal government magically evade, we have the other assaulting flanks of a blitzkrieg pincer perpetually advancing with draconian bills, laws, and politics. The latest is a slap in the face for all of us who thought we might be out of the woods with the covid medical tyranny and one of the ugliest chapters of freedom regression in the history of any nation in modern western civilization. Recently, the House of Commons – Canada’s parliament – voted down a motion to ban future vaccine mandates for covid. This might seem like we are time travelling back to 2021 and ignoring all the data, analyses, and empirical evidence of both the failure of mandates and their harms. It seems like we are in living a poorly written episode of some sitcom – like Gilligan’s Island - where the characters are continuously tripped up by the same obvious devices even though by any reasonable measure, we should be done with them like a dog might devour a treat.
How can we still be wrestling with mandates, deliberating on uniform vaccination policies, or even entertaining covid as a real threat?
Is the Canadian government living under a rock, or are they just gaslighting us on a level that is almost incomprehensible?
Can they really believe that these mandates will be able to be reinstated with the support of logic, science, and ethics?
Can they believe we will tolerate it?
Maybe they do.
Canadians have shown themselves to prize compliance over intelligence, joining the herd over following their instincts. We have veered so far from critical thinking and situational awareness that we have become one of the most likely populations in the world to be willing Guinea pigs for dystopian control experiments. Yes, I know that might sound a little far out and tinfoil hat-like. Still, it would do everyone well to remember the Milgram experiment, the CIA experiments on Canadians, and our governments long history of manipulative ploys aimed at citizens. Canadians have always waited for permission. Where Americans fought for their freedom from the British empire, Canadians waited obediently until the crown granted them a constitution in 1981. That’s insane when you think about it.
If you need more details on the very real threat of a digital control grid, I highly recommend checking out my friend Todd’s docuseries, The Big Picture. I have placed more information at the bottom of this article.
We have been so tolerant of Trudeau’s scandals and overreach that one might consider us a nation of NPCs – numb to any loss of our freedom and blind to the ambitions of wannabe dictators. With this latest overwhelming defeat in parliament, we have once again handed our fundamental rights and agency as thinking adults to a paternalistic authority that acts like it truly believes we are unfit to make our own decisions and be privy to the process. We celebrate our infantilization weekly like it is our sabbath, our holy sacrifice to the gods of Ottawa. Please govern me harder, Trudy, must be a bedtime prayer for way too many cuckolded Canucks. It is sad. We are traditionally a hearty and tough people, even if we are too polite and peaceful. It seems hockey has metamorphized to figure skating. Hunting and paddling have flipped to ordering in tofu dogs and swaying on the rocking chair. It seems we are effectively impotent.
While this sounds hopeless and pathetic, the complete zombification of the Canadian people is not complete. In fact, there is a growing faction of dissidents. The absurdity has awoken some who leaned toward comfort and convenience for way too long. Our fringe minority with unacceptable views has multiplied and found their views to resonate with many more than just a year or two ago. If I were asked to give my best analysis on where the self-defeating compliance and societal corrosion is coming from, I would point to a fairly small sector of entrenched liberals-at-heart whose tribalism has blinding them to the brutal truth that the Liberal party is not liberal at all in a classical sense. These folks have been unable to recognize that what was once their trusted and valued news channels, institutions, and allegiances are no longer what they were. All that brought the proud glow of morality, and the promise of affluence has now become a vehicle hellbent on the decay of the very civilization they think these structures uphold.
We can try and convert these sleeping idealogues or we can leave them behind, but we cannot allow them to continue to support the slippery slope of authoritarianism that has made significant gains in this country in the last few years. We are like frogs in a slow boil, and we can only save those who already realize it. It is time to get out. Unless you can tell me how to turn off the heat, we need to move and save ourselves any way we can.
Perhaps one of the most significant obstacles to the resistance against the encroaching global authoritarianism and biosecurity world is the risk of internal strife due to division. This is one of the oldest tactics for dictators and tyrants. They foment division through scapegoating while amplifying danger and outrage. This has been repeated throughout history again and again. Just in the last few years, different iterations of sowing divisions have been utilized.
We have the classic right vs. left political divide which gives rise to a plethora of subdivisions, such as pro-life vs. pro-choice, second amendment discord, immigration issues, social service funding, and many more. Unfortunately, the nuances between these divisions are rarely fleshed out between antagonists. If this were to happen, we might realize that our perceived adversaries align with our perspective more often than not. Sometimes there is just a single hot button issue that makes our disconnection seem impossible to bridge. I would suggest again that this is often not the case if we would take the time, patience, curiosity, and open-mindedness to understand the other. Opportunities for this kind of productive collaboration are rarely supported by the powers that be, the media, and those profiting from strife. In fact, they are usually heavily invested in maximizing the gap and the outrage.
What I am seeing in almost unbearable ways right now are the alliances of disparate agents that inspirationally came together during the pandemic being torn apart. There was some of this present in the Ukraine-Russia war, a certain amount in the climate change conversation, but from my vantage, this is most prominent in the current iteration of the Hamas-Israel conflict. It is hard to watch those who resonated so harmoniously about all things pandemic turn into bitter adversaries over this current crisis. I’m not saying that allies need to agree on all things. In fact, I think it is healthy and natural for our communities to have differing views and debates. However, the vitriol, disrespect, resistance to gaining understanding, and lack of sensitivity are all ingredients for breaking fellowships rather than improving empathy and arriving at more highly evolved intellectual perspectives.
What’s the answer?
I don’t claim to have a coherent and detailed plan other than what I would sum up as avoiding sensationalism, propaganda, and social media escalations, in lieu of calm, long-form, face-to-face, respectful discussions. I would hope that we could give each other the benefit of the doubt and that due to previous alignment, we hold hope that we might find a measure of congruence again. However, for this to happen, I think the primary motive needs to be gaining understanding of the other. Similar to couple counselling approaches, we would do best to avoid escalation and withdrawal; and to do this we would benefit from offering our critiques in receivable ways that are gentle and non-antagonistic. We need to be able to really listen and not be planning retorts while the other presents. The object should not be to win the debate but to find common ground and expand it as much as possible. I think this can probably only happen if both parties are dancing with nuance and avoiding reductionistic binaries. This way we move closer without surrendering the core of our morality. Perhaps this won’t work every time, but I believe it is worth the investment of energy. After all, the more we stay divided, the more we are susceptible to manipulation and further subjugation from the ruling class.
The gains we made in seeing many more people wake up to the system’s flaws and the nefarious ambitions of petty tyrants will recede if we do not reach across the aisle. If I was a wannabe dictator hoping for further galvanization of authoritarian rule, global control, and an impotent public, stoking the fires of emotionally-charged disagreement amongst the rising populace would seem to be a valuable tactic to pursue.
Who are our true foes?
Who is aligned with who?
What organizations and communities are adversaries of freedom and health at their core?
These are important questions, but the answers are often more complicated than we suspect. I don’t have any certainty here. I doubt anyone does. In fact, when people talk with certainty, this is likely a telltale sign that they are off course. While we might have certainty about compartmentalized aspects of certain issues, the whole beast comes with a multiplicity that does not lend itself to blanket condemnation or acceptance. For example, one could easily criticize America, Western civilization, the military, the medical system, and so much more, but to claim that their entirety is evil or wrong or worthy of complete annihilation is an immature mental masturbation, in my opinion. Even a putrid agency like the CIA probably has numerous honorable people working there and they just might have done a little good along the way.
If the alternative communities are going to last and grow, we must not regress into reactionaryism and childlike simplicity. The world is complex. Life is full of contradictions and impossible answers to ineffable questions. Admitting uncertainty might be the best protection from exacerbating pain and suffering further.
I don’t know. Maybe I’m wrong. What do you think?
FROM THE CREATOR OF UNINFORMED CONSENT & CHD CANADA COMES THE BIG PICTURE: LIFE INSIDE THE CONTROL GRID
This is the micro story of David and Collet Stephan who were charged with “Failure to provide the necessaries of life” after their son Ezekiel died mysteriously at Children’s Hospital in Alberta, Canada. While also looking at the macro story of how Globalists are using everything at their disposal, including our health, against us in what seems to be a great poisoning and an attempt to establish a digital system of slavery.
“We the people” are at war against Mr. Global and this film introduces the viewer to some of its biggest resisters. Through interviews with people like RFK Jr., Dr. Robert Malone, and Catherine Austin Fitts we start to uncover the failure and corruption of the W.H.O., the W.E.F., N.I.H., Health Canada and other regulatory bodies whose criminal devotion to a global cabal became so obvious during the “Public Health” reaction to Covid 19.
DISCLAIMER
This is not a film about a virus. This is not a film that sets out to prove or disprove the existence of viruses. This is a film that examines the aftermath of the fear created by the idea of a deadly virus. As the fear of Covid 19 fades in the consciousness of the masses and most people realize they never had reason to fear, we are left with many truths exposed. This film aims to present these truths in a reasonable way and offers solutions as we move forward.
Please know that our intentions are good and we seek only to present the truth and be a positive force in this world.
Have you given up on writing? Pity, that! Best to you. Neo.