Being Pfollowed and Pfressured
A (not so) brief history of being chased by the covid jab and its pfaithful mob
Still feeling pressured and/or judged negatively for not getting the covid “vaccine”?
It is stunning that with all that has come to light in the last two years since the so-called covid “vaccine” has rolled out that there are people - never mind authorities and media - who would still pressure others to “get vaccinated” [said in Biden’s whispery voice] and judge those who are not interested in such.
Even back in October and November of 2020, for those of us who read what was available from the Pfizer trials - a shameful display of lack of transparency which continues to this day - or an analysis of them, like Peter Doshi’s, we knew that preventing transmission was left as a hope and a prayer. They sure didn’t test for it.
Here’s Doshi, senior editor of the British Medical Journal and an expert in assessing efficacy and risk-benefit analysis, in November of 2020:
Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell (1)
Now, the mental gymnastics aficionados who are still attempting to defend Pfizer, the FDA, the CDC, and all the other chronic liars and obfuscators of the pandemic will say something like: vaccines aren’t designed to prevent transmission, or they never claimed that, or no vaccine is 100% effective, blah, blah, blah…
Bullshit!
When have you ever heard people talk like this about any other vaccine? If you did, how eager would you be to get these vaccines, never mind three or four times in a year?
Here’s one of the most celebrated vaccine-advocate physicians and dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Peter Hotez, spouting off:
“Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”(2)
Some have said it was too hard to test for asymptomatic infection, like Tal Zaks, CMO of Moderna, who said: “Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission, because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”(3)
Let me remind you how many people had to test weekly and sometimes daily during the pandemic just to be allowed to go to work or school. But the mighty Moderna, armed with taxpayer funds, Bill Gates’ cheque book, and various other funds from sources far and wide, decided to task a pass. Now, that’s the $cientific method at work.
Even after the admissions of the severely limited scope of testing, the claim circulated widely and echoed through the media and the ‘experts’: the vaccine is 95% effective!
This pig in makeup (apologies to the actual pigs out there for they are far more authentic and valuable creatures) was nothing more than a smokescreen where relative risk reduction (RRR) was used instead of absolute risk reduction (ARR) but even then, the risk reduction was only for mild symptoms.
Well, it turned out that the ARR was something between 0.8 and 1.2 percent efficacious; so basically insignificant.
Here’s a quick and clear explanation:
https://www.facebook.com/brad.rudner18/videos/564752604737807/
Yes, you heard that right, the risk reduction was only for MILD symptoms. The phase III trials occurred with a clinical endpoint of those who had mild symptoms and a positive PCR test and then final efficacy would be analyzed after 150 of these. Considering most people who had symptomatic covid-19 were mild cases, this was not going to show any real measure of efficacy.
“Data published by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in late April reported a symptomatic case hospitalisation ratio of 3.4% overall, varying from 1.7% in 0–49-year-olds and 4.5% in 50-64 year olds to 7.4% in those 65 and over. Even trials involving 30 000 or more patients would turn up relatively few cases of severe disease.”(4)
This lack of rigor or even basic testing for the clinical endpoint everyone was interested in did nothing to tamper the bold claims.
Doshi analyzed these in November of 2020:
Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—let’s be cautious and first see the full data(5)
And with more clarification in January of 2021:
Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data(6)
Remember, the promise of vaccine-derived herd immunity was our only way out of the pandemic. Well, how dafuq was that going to happen with a vaccine that could not stop transmission?
Hint: IT COULDN’T!! IT WASN’T!! AND IT DIDN’T!!
But that was only one of several reasons the vaccine would not provide a way out.
Regardless, our leaders, the media, and the experts all parroted this mis/disinformation and/or outright grifter lie.
Here’s a timeless compilation of their farcical ‘expertise’:
https://www.facebook.com/100007001802587/videos/972499097474114/
Heck, even back in early April of 2020, Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, introduced the pandemic and the only way out in one fell swoop:
His claims of lockdowns and the “New Normal” (pronounced: insane abnormal) until a vaccine arrived were both bizarre and completely unreasonable for anyone with a basic knowledge of the history and science of vaccine development.
How is a siege on civilization until a vaccine was ready anything but a term of ludicrous and tortuous years?!? What would be left?
If we were after a safe and effective vaccine, history and science would inform the reasonable individual that that could be five or ten or even fifteen years down the road. In the case of coronaviruses, maybe never.
Why?
Because this had been a failed area of research for decades. This sort of virus mutates rapidly and catching up to it is like playing one of those carnival games like toss the ping-pong ball into a resting position on top of the Coke bottle except add oil to the bottle, the ball, your hand and in your eyes.
The flu vaccine has efficacy which ranges from 10% to 60% and that is probably correlative efficacy anyway.(7)
Interestingly, I posted these data and this table in 2018 on Facebook. I went to retrieve it and while my post was still there, the link to the CDC’s webpage was a 404 – it no longer existed. Luckily, I know how to find things in the web archives and pulled it out.
Oh, the slippery stories of public health revisionists have their tentacles in everything.
So… then came the mRNA jabs to the rescue! Right? WRONG!
The history of mRNA vaccines is a graveyard of animals and terminated trials. It has been speckled with the highly undesirable effects of antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). This basically means if you get the jab, you are more likely to get more sick from further exposure to the same virus and your innate immune system is likely downgraded for other infections.
No bueno!
Then came the parade of more unrealistic claims. Suddenly, not one but two and three and then four “vaccines” were ready and almost perfect in their efficacy (what are the odds?) – or so the pfaithful chanted and repeated. I already covered the basis for this disinformation above.
Then came the boiler plate medical prescriptions. Just think about that, everybody was told they should get vaccinated regardless of any distinct biological circumstances. That is essentially the opposite of appropriate medical care – treat the patient.
Allergic to an ingredient (not that we would be informed of all of these)? Get vaccinated.
Had covid already? Get vaccinated.
Had an adverse event after the first shot? Get vaccinated.
Pregnant? Get vaccinated.
This one was particularly special to me because I knew from my years working in the medical device industry that no matter how safe and gentle a device (or intervention) might be, pregnant women are never used in initial trials. They are usually one of the last demographics to be included. It often will take 10 to 15 years before new medical interventions are given the green light for most pregnant women.
I mean why screw around with this highly sensitive and relatively short span of time. The precautionary principle clearly would direct us to approach this in the exact opposite manner than what was done.
Then came the bribery! I don’t think anyone had ever seen something like this before. If a medical intervention is so valuable, why do you need to bribe people to get it? Donuts, beer, strippers, lottery tickets, and so much more, were all offered.
I don’t know about you, but this was a major red flag for me. It is antithetical and unethical to manipulate people into a medical intervention through reward and/or punishment. True informed consent happens when a person is fully aware of the risk-benefit profile of the intervention AND can make their choice independent of the decision-making fogginess that might arise from the emotions tied to gains or losses beyond the medical effects that are the focus of the intervention.
These same inappropriate ethical considerations apply to:
· The shaming (i.e., guilt tripping people about being a granny killer, being “anti-science”, selfish, or pigeonholing people into reductionist labels like far-right, anti-vax, etc.)
· The coercion with threats of job loss, school restrictions, restricted access to restaurants, theaters, etc.
· The punishments like being taken off transplant lists, kicked out of residents, etc.
· The vaccine passport – what happen to the legality of maintaining privacy with health information?
The inversion of the fundamental tenets of public health became quite apparent to me almost immediately.
Public health is supposed to be about total harm minimization but what occurred was a sweeping neglect of everything except for covid. This included diminished resources, attention, and care for other health concerns that are more prevalent and impact more people with greater harms than covid. Saying this was sacrilegious though.
Covid became the one concern to rule them all (to adapt a phrase from Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings).
The myopia that encompassed the messaging of politicians, bureaucrats, media, and just about every public figure with influence was striking, disturbing and completely disproportionate to the reality of covid. Perhaps this could be excused for the first 15 days to flatten the curve but not so when those 15 days turned into 150 days, then 15 months, then 30 months and counting.
This irrational focus should have everyone questioning the jab but even more so, questioning the people behind this avalanche of nonsensical anti-health policy. There should be no doubt that these people and their pandemic policies have caused far greater harm than good.
Just look at the Our World in Data graph below. As I’ve been saying since April of 2020, the people making the decisions are either incompetent, negligent, or corrupt, or any combination of the aforementioned. There are no other explanations.
It is clear their way didn’t work.
Personally, I think we would have been better doing nothing. You might think that is extreme, but I am comparing doing nothing to what was done through lockdowns, mandates, experimental unsafe and ineffective mass vaccination campaigns, the uninhibited printing of currency, the closure of businesses, supply chain interruptions, separation of families and dying loved ones, keeping kids out of school, locking people in their homes struggling with addiction, abuse, and mental health, and so on and so on and so on…
A sophisticated modern answer could have been implemented in the form of the Great Barrington Declaration. This would have created focussed protection for the most vulnerable and used risk stratification to determine who could safely to continue life as usual, which would have fed the economy, staffed the healthcare system, and prevented the massive fallout we are seeing now and into the future.
Yes, things have cooled but still the threats and challenges from the authorities are hovering with talks of reintroducing mask mandates, vax passes, and other authoritarian diktats that don’t belong in a free society that claims to prize human rights.
Ironically, the left-leaning, liberal flag waving governments (I’m nonpartisan so don’t give me that far-right pigeonhole moniker) - who are, by definition and tradition, meant to be the fiercest advocates of inclusivity and human rights – have been the most vehement about “show me your papers” exclusionary and discriminatory (as well as unscientific and unethical) vaccine passports and other maniacal mandates.
My body, my choice. Right? Yeah, maybe only when it goes along with polling and virtue signalling.
Suddenly, mRNA vaccines are the answer to everything. Where vaccine trials have failed for decades, they are getting us ready for a new mRNA vax for whatever might threaten us. They are sure to let us know all about the threat too.
Hospitals regularly overflow, year after year, since they manage them to have no more beds than needed. However, now it is the impetus for all of us to get the booster, the bivalent, the shingles vax, the flu vax, the new RSV vax, to mask up. WhaDaFuq?!
RSV was caused by the Pfizer and Moderna vaxes and by the public health medieval interventions. They are scantly hiding it now…
But let’s get back to the ‘vid vaxes. All along the signs of danger and harm have continued to grow and what was once shared in small circles of diligent researchers, non-hypnotized and not compromised doctors, and scientists, has spread in size, scope, and severity through to more and more of the general populace.
It was a very rational position to wait and see. Long-term effects cannot be seen in the short term. That’s a physical impossibility… unless you have a time machine. Gates? Fauci? Schwab? No?
I don’t know why anyone would trust Bill Gates to give you truthful, discouraging information on an investment that gives him a 20:1 return. If he is saying this, you know the truth is much worse.
Regardless, the man is not a doctor nor a scientist. He doesn’t even have a degree, but he was charged with breaking anti-trust laws and was once the most hated businessman in America. A little rebrand and viola, he is telling the whole world how to deal with their health. [Head into brick wall repeatedly]
Without interpreting all the “Sudden Adult Deaths” as being caused by the vaccine, we only need to look at the VAERS system, the Yellow Card System (UK), and the EudraVigilance System (EU) to get a horrific picture of the harm being caused. One could also look at the V-Safe dashboard now hosted by ICAN after they used an FOIA and legal actions to get the uncooperative CDC to relinquish it.
And for those who want to give logically weak arguments that these vaccine reports are correlative and not proven to be caused by the jab, I have so much to reply with. I will say this though, even if 10% are accurate, it is MORE than enough to raise alarm bells. I will also say that these databases are vetted and laborious to fill out with legal consequences for falsifying claims. Finally, the Harvard-Pilgrim study showed that VAERS is undercounted showing only between 1-10% of actual adverse events. Those numbers are huge!
Even if we had a safe and effective vaccine, it should be everyone’s right to choose what goes in their body, ESPECIALLY IF IT DOES NOT PREVENT TRANSMISSION AND THEREFORE HAS NO BENEFIT TO OTHERS!
But covid is sooo dangerous they say… well, that’s not exactly true. Let’s jump to the demographics of risk with the impeccable work of one of the most published scientists alive, John Ioannidis:
“Across 31 systematically identified national seroprevalence studies in the pre-vaccination era, the median infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was estimated to be 0.035% for people aged 0-59 years people and 0.095% for those aged 0-69 years.
*The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.
*At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0-59 and 0-69 year old people, respectively.
*These IFR estimates in non-elderly populations are lower than previous calculations had suggested.”(8)
This article has become much longer than I planned so I will refrain from discussing early treatment and its role in choosing not to get vaccinated. Suffice it to say, the virus has always been treatable. Ignoring this and/or not even trying is medical negligence and iatrogenic malpractice. I personally knew about options as early as the summer of 2020.
There were resources available and reputable physicians offering support prior to the vaccine roll out. Unfortunately, EUA status hinges on there being no other viable treatment options. Conspiracy… no, couldn’t be. The rich and powerful never collude to increase their wealth (sarcasm).
That, my friends, is a motive. A motive that would be mixed in with historic profiteering, layers of conflict of interests, and uncovered lie after lie.
The uncovered lies was all that was needed to give people the space to make their own choice. The lies came again and again and again and again… so many… from politicians and pharmaceutical companies with criminal records... no surprise. But it is a surprise that the average person would trust these sources over their neighbors, friends, and families.
People want a recommendation on a restaurant or car or trainer and so on from their friends but when it comes to injecting an unknown, rushed, experimental substance into one’s body, they’ll be okay hearing from the most established dishonest professions in the world, politicians and pharma reps.
We just witnessed the introduction and mass acceptance of a product that was overpromised and underdelivered, which came without risk – financially or legally – to its manufacturers. A product whose R&D was paid for by the taxpayers as well as its pre-orders, marketing, fulfillment, and celebrated like nothing the world has ever seen. If you thought the new iPhone in the 2010s generated a buzz, Steve Jobs would’ve never dreamed of this kind of hype.
The bottom line is the product is not needed by most, it is designed for a strain that no longer exists (this includes the new bivalent iteration – kind of like the new iPhone but worse in its improvements and applications), has between a 60 to 90-day effect, at best, and doesn’t even stop transmission or really protect against severe disease and death. But mostly, it comes with told and untold risks that seem to be massively contributing to the precipitous rise in all-cause mortality officially recorded across the globe. All that and we don’t even have the data on oncogenicity, genotoxicity, and the other potential long-term effects that could occur.
I don’t know about you, but I’ll stick with the immune system that billions of years of evolution gave me over a warp speed, dubious product from a repeat criminal offender promoted by pathological liars who serve their special interest lobby groups and are drunk on emergency powers.
References:
1. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
2. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/those-coronavirus-vaccines-leading-race-120006184.html
3. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037
8. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.11.22280963v1
great write up, keep it up, I'm subbed :)